Site icon Haznos

Is The Big Bang Theory Universally Accepted?

Is The Big Bang Theory Universally Accepted?

<p style&equals;"text-align&colon; justify&semi;">The Big Bang Theory posits that at one time all matter in the universe was compressed into a single mass of near-infinite density&period; About 13&period;7 billion years ago this &&num;8220&semi;singularity&&num;8221&semi; suddenly expanded at the speed of light &lpar;or perhaps faster&rpar; into everything that we now see&comma; starting as an intensely hot cloud of superheated matter called plasma that condensed into atoms&comma; molecules&comma; stars&comma; planets and galaxies as it spread and cooled&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<h2 style&equals;"text-align&colon; justify&semi;"><strong>Is it Universally Accepted&quest;<&sol;strong><&sol;h2>&NewLine;<p style&equals;"text-align&colon; justify&semi;">The short answer is &&num;8220&semi;just about&period;&&num;8221&semi; No scientific theory is accepted by absolutely everyone&comma; even those that are well established through evidence&comma; but astrophysicists are virtually unanimous in supporting some variation of the Big Bang Theory as what spawned the observable universe in its present state&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p style&equals;"text-align&colon; justify&semi;">When the question becomes which version of the theory is accepted and what its implications are for broader issues like what came before&comma; consensus starts to break down&period; There are a number of different takes on the concept&comma; and a few scientists have begun to reject key elements of it entirely&period; Nonetheless&comma; it is accepted as fact that all matter originated at a single dense point from which the universe expanded into creation billions of years ago&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<h2 style&equals;"text-align&colon; justify&semi;"><strong>Why is it So Widely Accepted&quest;<&sol;strong><&sol;h2>&NewLine;<p style&equals;"text-align&colon; justify&semi;">Simply put&comma; the Big Bang Theory is the best model to explain the observations and measurements of the universe we currently have&period; More than that&comma; the math and science behind the Big Bang has predicted phenomena that were not capable of being observed at the time they were hypothesized&comma; but now have been demonstrated to exist&period; Such evidence includes the way subatomic particles act under Big Bang-like conditions&comma; like those simulated in particle colliders&comma; and the presence of uniform background radiation throughout the universe&comma; which is explainable by the Big Bang but nothing else thus far&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<h2 style&equals;"text-align&colon; justify&semi;"><strong>Does it Have Flaws&quest;<&sol;strong><&sol;h2>&NewLine;<p style&equals;"text-align&colon; justify&semi;">Despite being the best cosmological model&comma; the Big Bang Theory is problematic&period; Two of the main sticking points for scientists are referred to as the Horizon Problem and the Flatness Problem&period; The Horizon Problem stems from the uniformity of background radiation mentioned earlier&period; Radioactive particles are so uniform that it defies what we know about the laws of physics – there is no way particles separated by those distances should behave so similarly&period; The Flatness Problem is in that vein&comma; with the overall curvature of space-time being so small that it was unlikely for such flatness to have been a natural result of the Big Bang as previously understood&period; These challenges are confronted by the Inflationary Theory&comma; which says that physical law was different in the first seconds after the Big Bang&comma; as the universe expanded faster than light &lpar;which did not yet exist&rpar;&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<h2 style&equals;"text-align&colon; justify&semi;"><strong>What Are the Alternatives&quest;<&sol;strong><&sol;h2>&NewLine;<p style&equals;"text-align&colon; justify&semi;">Back in the 1930s&comma; the main competition of the BBT was the Steady State Universe model&comma; which claimed that new matter was somehow spontaneously being created at a regular rate&comma; maintaining an equilibrium throughout a fixed and ever-existing universe &lpar;as opposed to an expanding one&rpar;&period; Though that theory has long been dismissed&comma; new concepts of how the universe might have come about are being developed&comma; though compared to the Big Bang they are harder to understand&comma; involving new dimensions&comma; &&num;8220&semi;membranes&&num;8221&semi; of existence colliding with each other and thoughts about the texture of space-time that even top physicists have difficulty comprehending&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p style&equals;"text-align&colon; justify&semi;">For now&comma; however&comma; the Big Bang is still the theory that supports all mainstream models of the observable universe and how it began&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p style&equals;"text-align&colon; justify&semi;"><strong>Byline<&sol;strong><&sol;p>&NewLine;<p style&equals;"text-align&colon; justify&semi;">Gavin Pritchard writes on science&comma; technology &amp&semi; gadgetry&period; Owners of the iPhone should seriously consider viewing the wet iphone protection cases offered from kensington&period;com&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p style&equals;"text-align&colon; justify&semi;">Image credit goes to evansg&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;

Exit mobile version