Site icon Haznos

Georgia Town Sued for Requiring Residents to own Guns

<p>The Brady Center&comma; a national group that advocates for tighter gun laws and gun restrictions has sued the town of Nelson&comma; Georgia&period;   Nelson is a small town located north of Atlanta that recently passed a law requiring all residents to own at least one firearm&period;  The law carries a maximum penalty of &dollar;1000 fine if any household is found to not own a gun and accompanying ammunition&period;  The Brady Center has stated the new law is unconstitutional&comma; which is why they have decided to sue the town in an attempt to get the latest law overturned&period;<br &sol;>&NewLine;<strong>History behind the Law<&sol;strong><br &sol;>&NewLine;The law was drafted with the thought of public safety in mind&period;  There have been numerous government studies carried out over the years which have proven that having a firearm in your home is one of the best ways to protect yourself&comma; your family and your possessions against the possibility of burglary or theft&period;  The law was passed and approved unanimously by the 5 person city counsel of Nelson&comma; Georgia a few weeks ago&period;  The law immediately attracted national attention because it was the first law of its kind that mandated individuals to keep and maintain firearms and ammunition in their homes&period;<br &sol;>&NewLine;<strong>Brady Center Lawsuit<&sol;strong><br &sol;>&NewLine;The Brady Center filed a lawsuit against the town on the basis that requiring people to own firearms is a violation of the 1<sup>st<&sol;sup> amendment to the constitution because it violates a person’s freedom of speech and their &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;right to choose” surrounding issues that are related to personal life and home life&period;  The lawsuit also is on the grounds that the law violates the 14<sup>th<&sol;sup> amendment because it attempts to distinguish between head of household and non-head of household&comma; which essentially creates two distinct and separate classes of individuals&period;  Additionally the lawsuit states the law violates the 2<sup>nd<&sol;sup> amendment to the constitution because the amendment does not allow the government to require people to own firearms&period;<br &sol;>&NewLine;<strong>Effects on Residents<&sol;strong><br &sol;>&NewLine;The law has also had far-reaching effects on the residents of Nelson&period;  A Seattle immigration court has stated that the cost of purchasing a handgun and the required amount of ammunition to satisfy the law could cost residents in upwards of &dollar;700&period;  This is a difficult task for residents of the town where the economy is still struggling and people are having difficulty finding work&period;<br &sol;>&NewLine;Some residents are against the law while others are in favor of it&period;  One citizen claimed he was against the law because it took away his freedom of choice in regards to his self-determination when it comes to protecting his family and property&period;  There is also the chance that the law will allow firearms to fall into the hands of felons&comma; the mentally ill&comma; and those that are inexperienced when it comes to handling firearms&period;<br &sol;>&NewLine;The ultimate fate of the law will be decided after the lawsuit has been completed&comma; but most experts believe the law will stand because it includes exceptions for those that object to owning firearms on a religious or moral basis&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;

Exit mobile version